In scientific writing, [the words used should be as clear, simple, and well-ordered as possible;] there is little need for ornamentation. Flowery literary embellishments—metaphors, similes, idiomatic expressions—are very likely to cause confusion and should seldom be used in research papers. Science is simply too important to be communicated in anything other than words of certain meaning. And the meaning should be clear and certain not just to peers of the author, but also to students just embarking on their careers, to scientists reading outside their own narrow disciplines, and especially [emphasis in the original] to those readers (most readers today) whose native language is other than English. Many kinds of writing are designed for entertainment. Scientific writing has a different purpose: to communicate new scientific findings. Scientific writing should be as clear and simple as possible.
-- Gastel and Day, How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, 8th Edition, 2016, p. 4
1. UTHealth School of Public Health has compiled a list of schools and online resources that provide writing education.
2. The UTHealth School of Public Health Library has bound copies of all dissertations and theses (through 2014), as well as digital copies of dissertations (since 1973) and theses (since 2008). These resources are excellent references when thinking about, and working on, your own thesis or dissertation.
To search for dissertations and theses, visit the UTSPH Theses & Dissertations (sign-in required using your UTHealth credentials) database on ProQuest.
PDF versions of each guide and MS Word documents for each template are included below:
2. The Penn State Graduate Writing Center has also developed several resources related to writing conference, dissertation, and thesis proposals.
PDF and PPT versions of relevant workshops are included below:
The Office of Academic Affairs & Student Services at UTHealth School of Public Health hosts the following seminars to help facilitate student research.
1. IRB Basics Seminar: This seminar will help to demystify the process for obtaining IRB approval on your written culminating experience, thesis, or dissertation project.
2. Research Proposal Development Seminar: This seminar will help you identify a research project, assemble your research committee, and prepare your research proposal.
The following resources are specifically designed to help you improve your scientific writing skills.
1. e-Courses/lectures/video tutorials on scientific writing:
2. Guides/handbooks/handouts on scientific writing skills:
3. Celia M. Elliot, a science writer/technical editor in the Department of Physics at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, has compiled several "Resources for Proposal Writers" (e.g., "Writing Winning Proposals: The Heilmeier Catechism") and "Resources for Technical Writers and Students" (e.g., "Revising Technical Manuscripts to Improve Coherence, Clarity & Conciseness").
Not to be confused with scientific writing -- which is technical writing about science for scientists or other specialists -- science writing is popular writing about science for general readers. Science writers play a critical role by "translating" scientific expertise for non-scientists and non-specialists, that is, by contextualizing, interpreting, and explaining science to inform the lay public.
The following Web sites focus on science writing, and those related to awards periodically provide samples from winners and finalists:
An important step in writing a research paper is showing the strength and quality of the evidence you have chosen, which is best done in an evidence table. Knowing how to build an evidence table is thus a critical step of the research process, whether or not one is required. Evidence tables differ in size and content based on subject, but the following resources provide a great starting point for building your evidence table.
Essential resources for writing and publishing health research are provided by the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Network.
The following reporting guidelines may be particularly relevant to public health students:
1. For economic evaluations: Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement
3. For qualitative studies: SRQR: Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations and COREQ: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups
4. For randomised trials: CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
5. For systematic reviews: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
For more handouts on writing than the eye can see and the brain contain, visit the following websites: